Budget gaming laptops around the $500-600 range now offer entry-level GPUs like NVIDIA’s RTX 2050 or Intel Arc A530M. But which one is the better pick? Here’s a comprehensive comparison between the two, tested across 22 popular games to help you make the best choice.
Specs and Setup
Both GPUs come with 4GB VRAM, though the Arc A530M also has an 8GB variant. Intel’s Arc GPU has a wider memory bus and more memory bandwidth, though comparing specs like CUDA cores between these two architectures isn't straightforward.
Test Setup
Both GPUs were tested in identical Lenovo LOQ gaming laptops with:
- Same CPU and power limits
- Same cooling system
- Identical memory configuration
This ensures a fair, head-to-head performance comparison.
Gaming Performance
Let’s dive into the results from Cyberpunk 2077 and other popular games, examining FPS, power efficiency, and stuttering issues across both GPUs.
Cyberpunk 2077
Surprisingly, both laptops delivered similar frame rates. However, the Intel Arc laptop consumed 30% more power to achieve this, giving NVIDIA an edge in performance per watt and power efficiency. This extra power usage also led to the Arc GPU running hotter than its NVIDIA counterpart.
Battery Life
Running games on the NVIDIA laptop resulted in 59% more battery life compared to the Intel laptop.
PCIe Bandwidth
Interestingly, the NVIDIA laptop has fewer PCIe lanes between the CPU and GPU, but this doesn’t seem to impact gaming performance noticeably.
Game Benchmarks
Below is a summary of performance across various games, showing where each GPU shines:
-
Fortnite: The RTX 2050 was 24% faster than the Arc A530M in native resolution. When upscaling with NVIDIA’s DLSS (compared to Intel’s XeSS), the NVIDIA laptop provided a smoother, more consistent experience.
-
Red Dead Redemption 2: Intel Arc took the lead here, achieving a 9% FPS boost at native resolution. However, upscaling gains were modest.
-
Hogwarts Legacy: With XeSS, the Arc laptop saw a 57% improvement in FPS, while the NVIDIA laptop achieved 47% more FPS with DLSS.
-
God of War: NVIDIA outperformed Intel by 125% in 1% lows, meaning fewer frame drops and smoother gameplay. The Intel laptop exhibited significant stuttering without upscaling.
-
Apex Legends: Though both GPUs managed high FPS, the NVIDIA laptop had 69% better 1% lows, providing a smoother experience.
Average Performance Across Games
Over 21 games tested at 1080p, the RTX 2050 was 11% faster on average than the Arc A530M. In 1% lows, which reflect the worst performance dips, the NVIDIA laptop performed 47% better. This means the Intel Arc laptop showed more frequent stuttering.
Upscaling and Visual Quality
Intel's XeSS upscaling made certain games playable on the Arc GPU, but DLSS on NVIDIA GPUs consistently produced smoother and better-looking results. DLSS remains an exclusive feature to NVIDIA, giving it a leg up in games that support it.
Cost Comparison
Price-wise, the RTX 2050 laptop was generally cheaper than the Intel Arc A530M laptop, at times by around $50 USD. This price advantage, combined with better performance, makes the NVIDIA option more cost-effective.
Final Verdict
The NVIDIA RTX 2050 laptop consistently outperformed the Intel Arc A530M across most games, with advantages in:
- Battery life and power efficiency
- Overall FPS and smoother gameplay
- Superior visual quality with DLSS
If you’re shopping for a budget gaming laptop, the NVIDIA RTX 2050 offers a better gaming experience for your money.
However, if you're willing to stretch your budget slightly, consider the RTX 4050 for a significant performance boost, extra VRAM, and DLSS 3 frame generation.
Comments (3)