What are the Benefits of Manual Testing?

What are the Benefits of Manual Testing?
5 min read


Manual testing tests applications manually. The test cases/scenarios are done one by one by Testers manually without using any readymade tools, and further the results are verified. So manual testing is a process in which we usually compare the behavior of a piece of software. It can however be anything from a component, module, feature, or more with the predefined, expected behavior that we set during the starting phases of SDLC. Manual Testing holds the same importance as automated testing. Looking at the product complexities an individual chooses the type of testing. Being a crucial phase, Manual Testing Training Institute in Delhi can be a great medium to build a strong base for this profile. 

When do you use Manual Testing?

Manual verification is the most basic form of software testing. Any individual can do it without any prior knowledge of any particular tool. Even a student, who has a basic understanding of the application or testing of a system, can easily perform manual verification. Nonetheless, it is a necessary step in the software testing cycle. Any new system or application needs to be tested manually before automating the testing. Let’s look at different ways for manual testing;

Exploratory Testing: Exploratory testing is done by domain experts. They perform testing just by exploring the functionalities of the application without any knowledge of the requirements.

Usability Testing: To verify whether the application is user-friendly or not and is comfortability for an end user or not. The main focus of this testing is to check whether the end user can easily understand and operate the application easily or not. An application should be self-exploratory and not require any specific training to operate it.

Ad-hoc Testing: Ad-hoc testing is however quite opposite to formal testing. It basically s an informal testing type. In Adhoc testing, testers randomly test the application without following any documents and any test design techniques. This testing is primarily done if the knowledge of testers in the application under test is generally very high. Testers randomly test the application without any test cases or any given business requirement document.

When to prefer Manual Testing over Automation Testing?

# When the project is usually in the starting phase of development.

# When the testing user interface is especially about its visual aspects.

# When exploratory or Adhoc testing requires 

# If the project is short-term and writing scripts will be time-consuming in comparison to manual testing

# If the test case is however not automatable. Such as; a captcha.


Usually, Short-term cost reductions

The cost of purchasing software automation tools is relatively high. However, manual testing is less expensive in the short term because it requires no additional QA automation tools. Additionally, since it is an entirely manual process, one need not worry about adding the initial costs.

Less difficult to implement

You can hire a QA tester for manual testing quite easily in comparison to automation testing. Many manual testing tasks are easily done without access to code or any knowledge of coding. 

Greater attention to complex issues

Running automated test cases to further simulate every possible result for a feature can usually take a while. In this situation, manual testing lets testers concentrate mainly on logical edge cases for different challenging features and functionalities. However, it is rather easy to simulate every possible user path.

Recognize underlying user issues

Manual testing locates bugs that do not relate to the code, such as server responsiveness. It allows the developing application to use in the same manner as when it is released. Manual testing is more likely to find flaws when a user uses the software in a particular way.

Greater flexibility

In an agile environment, the capacity to react to every requirement change instantly is quite essential. In this case, manual testing offers the higher flexibility to quickly test a new feature or check any changes in the UI.


While automated testing is an integral part of the development process, it however cannot replace manual testing altogether. Manual testing is useful in testing features and functions that automated tests cannot accurately emulate, such as user experience and usability. If you look to make a career in manual testing, Manual Testing Training in Noida is the best option to start your journey with. Manual testing gives testers the additional freedom to use their expertise to emulate the user experience.

Sachin Pandey 54
Joined: 8 months ago
In case you have found a mistake in the text, please send a message to the author by selecting the mistake and pressing Ctrl-Enter.
Comments (0)

    No comments yet

You must be logged in to comment.

Sign In / Sign Up