The rice purity test is an online quiz that has been around for decades. It’s a self-assessment test that measures a person’s “purity” based on their experiences with sex, drugs, alcohol, and other risky behaviors. The test gives users a score from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a higher level of purity.
The rice purity test has been criticized for being outdated and sexist. It also reinforces harmful stereotypes about what it means to be a “good” or “bad” person. However, the test remains popular, especially among young people.
Has the rice purity test changed over time?
In some ways, yes. The test has been updated to include more modern behaviors, such as sexting and using social media. However, the core values of the test remain the same. It still promotes the idea that there is a right and wrong way to live one’s life.
Here are some specific changes that have been made to the rice purity test over time:
More inclusive language: The original rice purity test used gendered language, such as “member of the preferred sex.” Newer versions of the test use more inclusive language, such as “partner” or “sexual partner.”
More modern behaviors: The original rice purity test included questions about outdated behaviors, such as smoking cigarettes and watching pornography. Newer versions of the test include questions about more modern behaviors, such as sexting and using social media.
A focus on consent: Newer versions of the rice purity test place a greater emphasis on consent. For example, they may include questions about whether a person has ever engaged in sexual activity without their partner’s consent.
Despite these changes, the rice purity test still has many of the same problems as it did when it was first created. It is still:
Outdated: The rice purity test is based on traditional values about sex and morality. However, these values have changed over time. For example, it is now more widely accepted that sex outside of marriage is acceptable.
Sexist: The rice purity test is more judgmental of women than men. For example, it includes questions about a woman’s sexual history, but not a man’s.
Reinforcing harmful stereotypes: The rice purity test reinforces harmful stereotypes about what it means to be a “good” or “bad” person. For example, it suggests that people who are sexually active or who use drugs are less valuable than people who are not.
Overall, the rice purity test has changed in some ways, but it has remained largely the same at its core. It is still an outdated, sexist, and harmful test.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the rice purity test has changed in some ways over time, but it has remained largely the same at its core. It is still an outdated, sexist, and harmful test.
FAQ
What is the rice purity test?
The rice purity test is an online quiz that measures a person’s “purity” based on their experiences with sex, drugs, alcohol, and other risky behaviors. The test gives users a score from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a higher level of purity.
Has the rice purity test changed?
Yes, the rice purity test has changed in some ways over time. The test has been updated to include more modern behaviors, such as sexting and using social media. However, the core values of the test remain the same. It still promotes the idea that there is a right and wrong way to live one’s life.
Why is the rice purity test harmful?
The rice purity test is harmful for a number of reasons. First, it is outdated and sexist. Second, it reinforces harmful stereotypes about what it means to be a “good” or “bad” person. Third, it can lead to feelings of shame and guilt.
Should I take the rice purity test?
I recommend that you do not take the rice purity test. It is a pointless and harmful test that can make you feel bad about yourself.
What should I do instead of taking the rice purity test?
Instead of taking the rice purity test, focus on living your life in a way that makes you happy and fulfilled. Remember, there is no one right way to live. What matters is that you are happy and healthy and that you are not harming yourself or others.
No comments yet